Dead Russian girl in Casket

200-year-old Rockfish Could Be the Oldest and Biggest Ever Caught-Alaska

 A record-breaking rockfish was hauled in near Sitka last week. 

    Henry Liebman reeled in the 39.08-pound shortraker late last week, breaking the old record of 38.69 pounds for a shortraker caught on sportfishing gear.

    The age of the fish hasn’t yet been determined, but that too might be a record, a fishery expert said.

    Liebman, an insurance adjustor who works in Seattle, said he frequently visits Sitka to charter fish, so he knew that he had a large fish on when the shortraker struck.

    “I knew it was abnormally big (but I) didn’t know it was a record until on the way back we looked in the Alaska guide book that was on the boat,” Liebman said. 

    A fishery biologist said this shortraker may have been patrolling Sitka’s coast since the time of Alexander Baranov.

    Troy Tidingco, Sitka area manager for the state Department of Fish and Game, certified Liebman’s catch, and said this fish might be in the neighborhood of 200 years old.

    “The rougheye is the oldest-aged fish at 205,” Tydingco said. He said the longevity record for shortrakers, which are often confused with rougheyes, is 175 years. But that record fish, he said “was quite a bit smaller than the one Henry caught.” 

    “That fish was 32 and a half inches long, where Henry’s was almost 41 inches, so his could be substantially older.” 

    Samples of the fish have been sent to a lab in Juneau where the actual age of Liebman’s fish will be determined.

     Rockfish live at depths that range between 84 feet all the way down to almost 4,000 feet. Liebman said he was fishing at a depth of around 900 feet, 10 miles out when his giant shortraker took his bait. 

    The fish went back to Washington with Liebman, who plans to have it mounted. 

     He also took home a big fish story that he said he’s already been “getting a lot of mileage” out of.

Autopsie of a indian girl

14 Year Old Female Dies in Bike Accident-Brazil

Autopsie of a Man shot him self in Head

Man Killed by a Bear

Man shot dead by two Guys-Brazil

he have age 28

Marla Cardamone, Abortion Death

Suit by survivors of Marla Anne Cardamone, age 18, mother of 1, alleged that Marla became pregnant while on Tegretol and Elavil for depression.

Marla's mother, Deborah Cardamone, commented:

Originally, she had planned to put her baby up for adoption, since she already had a toddler to take care of, but a medical-social worker at the hospital strongly urged Marla to have a safe and legal abortion.

The social worker argued that Marla had damaged her baby because of medication she had taken. Statistics gave a 92% chance that the baby was fine, but Marla had a sonogram to be sure. After the sonogram, that social worker kept pressuring Marla to have an abortion. Finally, Marla gave in.

Marla was admitted to Magee Women's Hospital for the abortion August 15, 1989.

Although the urea induction technique was contraindicated due to Marla's medical history, Michael W. Weinberger injected urea into MarlaÂ’'s uterus.

Either an error during this injection or some other mishap caused generalized necrosis of MarlaÂ’'s uterine wall. The laminaria were also inserted by Weinberger in a manner resulting in septicemia, and massive cortical necrosis of the kidneys.

Marla became ill during the night, with nausea, vomiting, urinary incontinence, and dried blood on her teeth. Her pulse and temperature were severely elevated.

At 6:30 AM the charge nurse contacted a the first of several doctors to treat Marla, but no were cultures taken.

By 7 AM Marla was "increasingly disoriented and speaking inappropriately."

By 7:15, her blood pressure had fallen to 80/40, her pulse had shot up to 144, and she was "unresponsive, grunting loudly, and having seizures."

At 10 AM, intravenous antibiotics were administered. Marla was dead from septicemia at 12:15 PM.

The suit filed by Marla's family noted failure to notify them of her deteriorating condition. Marla's mother and quadriplegic father, who Marla had helped to care for, adopted Marla's child.

The suit faulted the doctor and hospital with performance of a psychiatrically contraindicated abortion, failure to evacuate the dead fetus, administering an overdose of Pitocin, and failure to consult qualified doctors.

Marla's mother adds bitterly:

I had to file a lawsuit to get any answers. Marla had died of septicemia--a massive infection from the abortion. I also learned that the social worker had never seen MarlaÂ’'s sonogram or discussed the results with her. Marla never saw the words on the sonogram report that would have changed everything: No abnormalities detected. My daughter was pressured to have an abortion, and there had been no reason for it, no reason at all.

I've often wondered why pro-choice women's groups have never expressed any sympathy or concern over Marla's death. Why aren't they demanding justice? Why aren't they concerned that Marla was lied to about the condition of her baby and wasnÂ’'t shown the sonogram results? Why aren't they concerned that proper treatment was delayed because Marla was misdiagnosed by a resident who was only two months out of medical school? Why are they so quiet?

I believe it's because pro-choice groups don't want women to read or hear about abortion injuries and deaths. Bad publicity hurts their cause. That's why they prefer that Marla and her baby remain hidden statistics.

3 Rapist Executed by Hanging-Iran

Rebels Girl in Syria fighting Syria Army